this way, you will not be biased in predicting the likelihood that the harm occurred." Findings Therefore, as you hear the facts of the case, try and view them as someone who does not know the outcome. This will be difficult because we already know that the injury did occur and we tend to overestimate the likelihood of something happening if we know that it did happen. The debiasing instruction given to half of each case's jurors said: "Part of your duties in this case will be to determine the likelihood of injury given the defendant's actions. After reading the debiasing instruction (for half the participants) and one of the cases (for all participants), participants were then asked to estimate the likelihood that the defendant's behavior would lead to injury. Half of the participants given each case summary additionally were provided a debiasing instruction that was read prior to reading the case. The other case involved a practical joke that inadvertently led to an injury to an elderly person. One case involved an advocacy group that conducted a provocative political rally that led to two politicians being killed by someone who attended the rally. Participants were given one of two case summaries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |